The mobile phone market is expected to grow in 2020 and beyond, with overall shipment volume arriving at 1.654 billion in 2022, and the number of mobile phone users passing the 3 billion imprint by that year. Plainly, having a solid versatile presence is never again discretionary, and companies must see mobile app development as a key prerequisite for growth.

In any case, with the decision to develop a mobile application comes numerous significant choices that must be made to effectively catch the attention of mobile phone users. The main among them is the decision between hybrid vs native application development. Every one of these two approaches to mobile application development has its own ups and downs, and we will go over them in detail in this article to clarify which approach is reasonable for which reason.

Read also: The Importance of Mobile Apps in the Modern Business Environment

What’s the distinction between Hybrid and Native mobile applications?

Native applications are created in a platform-specific programming language, making them compatible just with the corresponding platform. Android applications are developed primarily in Java and iOS applications are created in Apple’s Swift.

Hybrid applications, then again, are created utilizing web technologies, for example, HTML5, JavaScript, and CSS in combination with native components. They are basically platform-independent sites displayed utilizing a native web view, which is a native component provided by operating systems like Android and iOS to load web content.

The pros and cons of Hybrid vs Native app

As we discussed above the hybrid and native app development has its own advantages and disadvantages. When developing a mobile app these pros and cons should be considered.

Did you know?

Mobile websites get more visitors than mobile apps, but visitors spend more time in apps..

Native Apps

Pros:

• Native applications work offline, once downloaded the user won’t require any cache memory or data.

• Consistent, easy to understand and natural interface for any loyal user of a specific sort of operating system.

• Gadget functionality based utility applications have simple access to gestures, contact list, camera, GPS, accelerometer and all inbuilt gadget highlights.

• Security concerns are pretty much equivalent to hybrid applications yet inbuilt security models are available for Android just as iOS.

• Speed is the greatest bit of leeway of native applications. Responsiveness is everything with regards to mobile applications.

Cons:

• Native applications will, in general, be a more expensive proposition to the mobile application development company. This is particularly the situation for developers who might want their application to be compatible with different mobile phones and platforms.

• The expense of application maintenance and application updating is likewise higher for native applications, particularly if this application underpins more than one versatile platform.

• The way toward getting the application approved at the application store can prove to be long and monotonous for the developer and need not generally bring about success.

Users of various mobile phones might be using various versions of the application, which makes it hard for the developer to maintain and offer support.

Did you know?

Nearly 70 percent of millennials say social networking apps are among their most commonly used. Social media marketing just got better!

Read also: Ways How to Grow Business Using Social Media and Instagram

Hybrid Apps

Pros:

• Adaptable to different platforms. A similar code can be re-utilized for Android, iOs, and Windows with minor changes in the modules and native containers.

• You can transform your responsive site into an application in a matter of moments utilizing the available support frameworks and modules.

• A hybrid application can be put on application stores. So essentially you get the advantage of being in an application store environment without the expenses of building up a native application for a particular operating system.

• A colossal open source development language implies there is a tremendous network for help and a great deal of documentation.

• Security concerns are pretty much equivalent to hybrid applications yet inbuilt security models are available for Android just as iOS.

• Speed is the greatest bit of leeway of native applications. Responsiveness is everything with regards to mobile applications.

Cons:

• Works incredibly for composing programs with a standard set of features. In the event that a developer needs something uncommon, it may take considerably additional time and money to locate the correct solution.

• Despite the fact that many cross-platforms support countless APIs, there is still a need to utilize different APIs through embedded modules that are part of the code written in the native language.

• You may need to create native libraries to make a great interface as android and iOS utilize different application design standards.

• Generally, poor performance, particularly when working with a graphic image.

• Native modules can be an issue on the off chance that some of them conflict or on the off chance that one of them has a bug. Troubleshooting errors can be very entangled: now and again it’s difficult to comprehend where the source of the error since error messages can be uninformative.